<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 20YEARS in Communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ideahaus.com/20years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ideahaus.com</link>
	<description>Helping clients communicate to their markets to create brands and increase sales.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:30:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ideahaus</title>
		<link>http://ideahaus.com/20years/comment-page-1/#comment-1170</link>
		<dc:creator>Ideahaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 23:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideahaus.com/?page_id=1578#comment-1170</guid>
		<description>I think you raise a good point, Mr. Deaner; Art vs Communication. I agree that there are better editors than me, but i also know I can communicate using video. Depending on my purpose I would take the helm, or hire a professional with more experience, different style, greater technical skills, etc. Many times, especially as of late, my clients are more concerned about communicating than art, and getting more out of their budgets (cue conversations on you get what you pay for ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you raise a good point, Mr. Deaner; Art vs Communication. I agree that there are better editors than me, but i also know I can communicate using video. Depending on my purpose I would take the helm, or hire a professional with more experience, different style, greater technical skills, etc. Many times, especially as of late, my clients are more concerned about communicating than art, and getting more out of their budgets (cue conversations on you get what you pay for ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Deaner</title>
		<link>http://ideahaus.com/20years/comment-page-1/#comment-1144</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Deaner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 16:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideahaus.com/?page_id=1578#comment-1144</guid>
		<description>Mr. Magalis, in the first four paragraphs of your reply you talk about alcohol, drugs, noses, and um, being Greek, ... again. Oh, and Kevin&#039;s Time Stuntilator. I am not implying anything, just saying is all. 

I am not sure that complete technology in the hands of all artists is a good thing. I believe it makes these things, and the &quot;art&quot; it produces, unearned, without the filters of experience, time, diligence, perseverance, and input of those who&#039;ve gone before, and proper competition for space in the world. This all leads to a lowered bar, and ultimately a less satisfying experience and result, while diluting the impact of good creative. I am sorry but I don&#039;t see Final Cut in the kitchen as positive. Once in a great while someone produces something cool or important this way, but it is rarely repeated, and less lasting. That kind of success would have more to do with luck, beginners minds, and random quantity. I&#039;ll being willing to bet that you are proudest of some of the work you did when you had to run to ten places, and the collaboration that occurs in that process contributes immeasurably.

And so what if I was high, would it have been better any other way, or more tolerable for me? Blame Kevin, he baked the cookies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Magalis, in the first four paragraphs of your reply you talk about alcohol, drugs, noses, and um, being Greek, &#8230; again. Oh, and Kevin&#8217;s Time Stuntilator. I am not implying anything, just saying is all. </p>
<p>I am not sure that complete technology in the hands of all artists is a good thing. I believe it makes these things, and the &#8220;art&#8221; it produces, unearned, without the filters of experience, time, diligence, perseverance, and input of those who&#8217;ve gone before, and proper competition for space in the world. This all leads to a lowered bar, and ultimately a less satisfying experience and result, while diluting the impact of good creative. I am sorry but I don&#8217;t see Final Cut in the kitchen as positive. Once in a great while someone produces something cool or important this way, but it is rarely repeated, and less lasting. That kind of success would have more to do with luck, beginners minds, and random quantity. I&#8217;ll being willing to bet that you are proudest of some of the work you did when you had to run to ten places, and the collaboration that occurs in that process contributes immeasurably.</p>
<p>And so what if I was high, would it have been better any other way, or more tolerable for me? Blame Kevin, he baked the cookies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Evans</title>
		<link>http://ideahaus.com/20years/comment-page-1/#comment-1133</link>
		<dc:creator>George Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ideahaus.com/?page_id=1578#comment-1133</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s some strange-ass statistic that says that 1 year today in our business represents in innovation and technology and ideas and hotter chicks what 10 years represented (in relative terms) 10 years ago.  And that ratio is only getting larger or smaller, depending (I&#039;m terrible with math).  As such, it&#039;s more incumbent upon us to stay with it - even us old farts - and I like to think that folks like Mike Brunner and Brian Bronaugh and KP and me, old farts all - have been able to grasp this a little bit.  This project will allow us to create a repository for some of the thinking that has shaped us, and this biz we&#039;re in, for future generations of poor sots who follow the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s some strange-ass statistic that says that 1 year today in our business represents in innovation and technology and ideas and hotter chicks what 10 years represented (in relative terms) 10 years ago.  And that ratio is only getting larger or smaller, depending (I&#8217;m terrible with math).  As such, it&#8217;s more incumbent upon us to stay with it &#8211; even us old farts &#8211; and I like to think that folks like Mike Brunner and Brian Bronaugh and KP and me, old farts all &#8211; have been able to grasp this a little bit.  This project will allow us to create a repository for some of the thinking that has shaped us, and this biz we&#8217;re in, for future generations of poor sots who follow the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
